ITAT Chennai held that UPS and Printers being part of a computer systems and hence eligible for higher depreciation at the rate 60%
ITAT Delhi held that total allowance of the remuneration (including bonus) to the partners has to be within the permissible limit of provisions of section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that Inland Haulage Charges forms part of income from operation of ships in international traffic and hence covered under Article-9 of India-France Tax Treaty is not taxable in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that interest income earned by co-operative society on its investment held with the co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that Industrial Promotion Subsidy received under Package Incentive Scheme 2007 declared by the Government of Maharashtra is capital receipt and hence not taxable.
ITAT Pune held that repairs & maintenance expenditure incurred in rented workshop and showroom is revenue expenditure and allowable as deduction under section 30(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act,1961
ITAT Chennai held that test applied by AO that land was sold to a company which was not carrying agricultural operations is not justifiable for denying exemption to sale of agricultural land u/s 2(14) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that Executive search fee is not ‘fee for technical services’ under Article 12(5)(a) as well as 12(5)(b) of the India Netherlands Tax Treaty.
ITAT Pune held that the amount received as compensation for pre-closure of BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) project is capital receipt. Hence, treating the same as revenue receipt by invoking provisions of section 28(ii)(d) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.
Smt. Priyanka Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Taking into facts and circumstances of the case it is an evident from the show cause notice u/s 274 read with section 271AAB of the Act that the Assessing Officer was not clear i.e whether it is for the clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of […]
