Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

ITAT Pune held that the amount received as compensation for pre-closure of BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) project is capital receipt. Hence, treating the same as revenue receipt by invoking provisions of section 28(ii)(d) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.

Facts-

The assessee had received the impugned compensation amount i.e Rs. 18,51,61,000/- from the Government of Maharashtra in lieu of closure of it

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31