Case Law Details
Case Name : Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
ITAT Pune held that the amount received as compensation for pre-closure of BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) project is capital receipt. Hence, treating the same as revenue receipt by invoking provisions of section 28(ii)(d) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.
Facts-
The assessee had received the impugned compensation amount i.e Rs. 18,51,61,000/- from the Government of Maharashtra in lieu of closure of its Build, Operate, Transfer “BOT” projects at three location. Both the lower authorities have invoked section 28(ii)(d) of the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

