Aroshi Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Circular No.03/2017 dated 21.02.2017 provides that no further clarification or verification is required to be made in a case of an individual when the deposited amount during demonetization period is upto Rs. 2,50,000/-. In the present case, the assessee who is a housewife having no other source of income […]
ITAT Delhi held that eligible deduction under section 11 of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely on the basis of technicalities.
Sharad Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) It is seen from the record that the lower authorities have been disputing the factum of Will. It is also undisputed fact that in the Will there is no specific mention relating to weight and description of such jewellery which was being bequeathed by the testator. However, it […]
ITAT Delhi held that deriving Arm’s Length Price without resorting to any method prescribed as per the Income Tax Rules is unjustifiable. Accordingly, TPO/ AO directed to determine Arm’s Length Price.
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is evident from the same that the ITAT held that the claim of expenditure incurred by the assessee on the abandoned project, amounting to Rs.20.50 lakhs, was allowable to it subject to the assessee demonstrating the fact that it had incurred the expenditure itself, […]
In best judgment assessment Assessing Officer must not act dishonestly or vindictively & honestly & fairly estimate proper assessment figure
Reasons, as recorded for reopening reassessment, are to be examined on a standalone basis to determine validity of section 147 proceedings
ITAT held that acquisition of new house in wife’s name would not jeopardise Section 54 exemption claim of assessee as sale proceeds is utlised for construction of house property
Assessee filed return of income within extended due date with Form No. 67 & complies with requirement of Rule 128(9) and entitled to claim FTC
Isolux Corsan Power Concession India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case AO has treated Interest income as Income from other sources as Business of Assessee was not set-up in the year under consideration and held as follows:- In the present case, the appellant has miserably failed to demonstrate that during the year […]
