ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act is allowed against the gross total income.
Penalty order did not specify the charge & penalty was imposed purely on the basis of estimation of income so not valid
Laxmi Narain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In the present case there is no dispute regarding the fact the assessee deposited Rs. 10,49,000/- in cash on 18.11.2016 during demonetization period and the AO picked up said amount for making addition in the hands of assessee u/s. 69A of the Act. From the copies of the order […]
ITO Vs Marda Associates (ITAT Kolkata) CIT (A) held that A.0. misunderstood that the benefit/ incentive/additional margin passed on by the appellant through credit notes was in the nature of commission. He further, misunderstood that discount/ additional margin could be given only on the invoice and not post invoice. It is submitted that the commission […]
Impugned order was passed by CIT(A) in absence of assessee. Assessee did not get an opportunity to represent his case before CIT(A)
Riya Sunil Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) A.O has come to the conclusion that cash deposited in the bank account of the assessee has no connection with tuition income received by her. Therefore, the AO treated the cash deposited during the demonetization period appearing in the bank account as unexplained money u/s 69A of the […]
Inderjit Singh Mann Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) The assessee has filed copy of the sale deed dated 19.2.2009 in the paper book in which it is specifically mentioned that assessee received various advances from the purchasers on different dates in the year 2007 before execution of sale deed. According to the chart prepared by the […]
Pratap Joisher Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that assessment framed on the basis of ‘base note’ without preferring to collect evidence based on ‘consent waiver form’ is not sustainable in the eyes of law. Facts-On receiving information by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) from French Authority under Article 28 of the […]
ITAT Mumbai held that there is a direct nexus between interest received on loan given to firm and interest payment on loan taken from the bank and hence netting of the net interest income allowable under section 57 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad held that interest income received towards loan extended against mortgage of properties cannot partake the character of rental income.
