Understand the landmark case of Maqsood Ali Vs ITO, where the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi ruled against imposing a penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance of statutory notices given reasonable cause.
Get an in-depth analysis of the ITAT Delhi case, where the appeal filed by Geetu Kamra was dismissed due to her continuous absence and non-compliance with court directives.
Delve into the recent ITAT Bangalore case of Balram Corporate Services Pvt Ltd Vs ITO, discussing the non-retrospective nature of late fee charges under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the details of the case between Voith Siemens Hydro Private Limited and ACIT regarding transfer pricing proceedings. Analyze the expenses incurred for engineering services and administrative support services, the examination of invoices, and the arguments presented. Understand the outcome and implications of the case.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as identity of loan creditor proved along with creditworthiness of the transaction.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance u/s 14A of the Act is made in respect of expenses attributable to exempt income and not the taxable income. Further, the disallowance u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act should not exceed the exempt income of that year.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that grant received under Sampoorna Gramin Swarojgar Yogna (SGSY) from Government of Gujarat and interest earned on such grant cannot be treated as revenue receipt. Accordingly, the same is not liable to be taxed.
ITAT Mumbai held that non-receipt of confirmation from the sundry creditors under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act cannot result into addition since parties are identified, transaction of purchase of land is accepted and reason for outstanding amount is explained.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition towards unexplained cash credit u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act untenable as cash deposited during the demonetization period duly explained.
ITAT Jaipur held that income surrendered during the course of search cannot be said to qualify as an undisclosed income in the context of section 271AAB read with the explanation thereto and hence penalty u/s 271AAB of Income Tax Act not leviable.
