Explore the case Fab Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, where ITAT Ahmedabad upheld disallowance on long-term capital loss claim from sale of company shares.
Delhi ITAT removes penalty on Riyasat Palaces Limited in tax dispute with ACIT, redefining interpretation of inaccurate particulars.
Get a comprehensive breakdown of the ITAT Delhi case, Rukshana Begum vs ITO, involving explained funds and investment for wife’s financial security in old age.
Exploring the ITAT Agra ruling on Sh. Akshat Doneria Vs ITO, clarifying that no penalty under s.271(1)(b) should be imposed if non-compliance arises from non-receipt of notice.
Raigarh Jute & Textile Mills Ltd triumphs as ITAT Kolkata rules share trading loss genuine. Detailed analysis reveals weak circumstantial evidence.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the amount of refund issued to the assessee will be first adjusted against the interest then, after that against the principal amount.
ITAT Jaipur held that imposition of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as income does not fall in the category of undisclosed income.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that capital gain taxable in the year in which possession of land is granted to the developer vide the original development agreement and not in the year in which supplementary agreement is entered.
ITAT Delhi held that rendering cloud computing services/ Amazon Web Services (AWS Services) cannot be held to be liable to tax in India either as royalty or as Fees for Technical Services (FTS)/ Fees for Included Services (FIS).
ITAT Mumbai held that as per Section 56(2)(ix) of the Act money received as advance would be treated as income liable to tax in the hands of recipients under the head ‘Income from Other Sources’ provided such advance is forfeited and the negotiations do not resulted in transfer of the capital assets.
