Assessee argued that since they were subject to audit under the Maharashtra State Co-Operative Act, their due date under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act was extended to October 31, 2018. Thus, they filed their ITR well within the time limit.
In Vinodchandra Dalsukhram Gokhlani Vs ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on addition for unaccounted sale proceeds based on loose papers and retracted statements
ITAT Chennai in Estate of Late Smt. Jayanthi Krishnamurthy Vs ACIT held that no addition could be made under section 153A in absence of incriminating evidence resulting from a search, especially if assessment is unabated.
ITAT Mumbai held that change of opinion is not permissible under the garb of reopening of assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that payments received towards interconnectivity utility charges from Indian customers / end users cannot be considered as Royalty to be brought to tax in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and also as per DTAA.
An in-depth analysis of the Pitchi Reddy Garlapati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) case, focusing on the addition for a generous cash gift to a grandson by his maternal grandfather.
In the case of Metro Filling Station vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi), an addition for unexplained cash deposits was challenged. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee.
Analyzing the ITAT Pune decision in the case of RBL Bank Ltd Vs DCIT on non-allowance of interest on delayed TDS payment and other key issues. A comprehensive review for financial and tax professionals.
Explore the legal battle in Smt. Shashikala Ram Kumar vs ACIT case, analyzing additions under 40(a)(ia) & 40A(3). Understand key arguments, judicial opinions, and the Tribunal decision.
An in-depth analysis of the case between Majestic Properties Pvt. Ltd and PCIT at ITAT Delhi. The case examines the limitations of revisionary power under section 263 based on audit objections. Discover key outcomes and implications.
