ITO Vs Late Shri B. Kailasam (ITAT Chennai) Since availing a loan itself is consideration and therefore, constructive benefit was very well accrued to the assessee when the loan was availed by the concerned company, which was owned partly by the assessee. Since, the mortgaged property was sold in discharge of the mortgage created by […]
CIT may consider an order of the AO to be erroneous not only it contains some apparent error of reasoning or of law or of fact on the face of it but also because it is a stereo typed order which simply accepts what the assessee has stated in his return and fails to make enquirers which are called for in the circumstances of the case.
Estate of Late Vrajlal Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We noticed that explanation of the assessee that two bank accounts belonged to Shri Rajesh Mehta have been accepted by the search officials as well as Assessing Officer. We notice that the balance available in those bank accounts have been assessed by the learned CIT(A) only, […]
Dharam Deep Public School Vs. Dy. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Section 200A of the Act deals with processing of statement of tax deducted at source, whereas, section 234E of the Act deals with fee for default in furnishing statements.Iit was held that ‘intimation raising demand prior to 01/06/2015, u/s 200A of the Act, levying fee u/s […]
Dy. CIT Vs Maan Aluminum Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The undisputed fact is that the assessee had paid commission to two non-residents on export orders procured by them. It is also undisputed that the non resident agents did not have any permanent establishment or permanent place in India and the agents operated from outside India. It is […]
Monarch Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Under section 57(iii) of the Act, only those expenditure are to be allowed which are related to earning of income from other sources. Since the expenditure claimed by the assessee was not incurred to earn income from other sources, the same cannot be allowed. FULL TEXT OF […]
Dy. CIT (LTU) Vs. Bosch Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) Section 23 of MSMED Act has specifically provided that the interest paid to the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises on account of delayed payment is not allowable as deduction from income. Section 23 of MSMED Act has specifically prohibited the assessee from claiming the deduction from the […]
M/s. Varsha Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) In the case under consideration, in the computation of income,the assessee had not claimed any exempt income. The expenditure claimed by it in the profit and loss account have not been shown to have been incurred for earning any exempt income during the year under consideration. […]
Shri Ramesh Salecha HUF Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Revenue could not produce before us any evidence to show that notice under sections 143(2) has been issued or served to the assessee the re-assessment made under sections 143(3) read with section 147 is void ab-initio in view of the above decisions of the Honorable Allahabad High Court in […]
Where assessee had not earned any tax-free income, then, corresponding expenditure also could not be worked out for dis allowance.
