In the case of Ravikumar Vs PCIT, Madras High Court directs belated ITR filing under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act for TDS refund on MACT compensation.
Explore the Orissa High Court’s interpretation of Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act in the case of Satyam Castings Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Director, DGGI.
Madras High Court quashes order against Salcomp Manufacturing India Pvt. Ltd., granting opportunity to contest tax demand for assessment years 2011-2016.
Delhi High Court upholds trial court’s decision to frame charges against defendants accused of smuggling heroin disguised as rock salt.
Punjab & Haryana High Court rules assessees aren’t required to keep the department’s e-portal open at all times to track actions. Detailed judgment analysis provided.
In R. Krishnaprasad Vs Commissioner of Customs, Kerala High Court directs expeditious testing of Technical Grade Urea to avoid port detention, demurrage, and charges, ensuring swift resolution.
In case of S. Subramanian & Co Vs ITO, Madras High Court directs Assessing Officer (AO) to pass a fresh order as notices sent to petitioner’s email id, created by accountant, were not acknowledged.
Kerala High Court held that consideration received by the trustees for relinquishment of trusteeship in the Trust cannot be treated as a capital receipt for the purposes of assessing the same under the head of capital gains.
Delhi High Court held that conjoint reading of Section 56(2)(viib) read along with Rule 11UA(2), the option of choosing a method of valuation of shares stands vested solely in the hands of the assessee.
Discover the ruling by Himachal Pradesh High Court on Rule 99 of CGST Rules, 2017, mandating Form GST ASMT-10 notice before a show cause notice issuance.
