Indus Towers Ltd. Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) The issue raised is that of gross suppression and misstatement by the petitioner, which led to a false projection of the outstanding liability/ refund due from/ to the petitioner. It is pointed out by Mr. Raghvendra Singh that the petitioner was required to file a consolidated return […]
Amit Shah seeks regular bail in Gujarat High Court for GST Act offences. Court considers arrest duration, charge nature, and conditions for release.
It was admitted in the counter-affidavit itself that the assessee had cleared the dues and as on date no tax dues were payable in respect of previous financial years. Inasmuch as the tax has been subsequently paid, continuance of the impugned prosecution under section 276C(2) would only amount to an abuse of legal process.
Principal Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Indian Medical Association (Delhi High Court) The issue under consideration is that whether service tax is applicable on clubs or associations incorporated prior to 1st July, 2012? The definition of “club or association” contained in Section 65(25a) makes it plain that any person or body of persons providing services […]
The applicant is facing charge under Section 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which is punishable maximum for a period of 5 years. As in the present case, wrongful availment of the Input Tax Credit is beyond Rs.5 crores
There is a delay of 586 days in filing the appeal for which no explanation was offered. even if some explanation was offered, we could have exercised our discretion. In this case, condonation of the delay would amount to condoning the utter failure or negligence on the part of the department to take steps with regard to this appeal.
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd Vs. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr.Nirzar Desai, learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent no.1. Mr.Parth Bhatt, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr.Kartik Pandya, learned advocate waives […]
N J Devani Builders Pvt. Ltd Vs Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) Petitioner had voluntarily registered under the head of ‘commercial /industrial construction services’, the petitioner is liable to pay service tax, is not tenable as the petitioner cannot be held to be liable to pay service tax before 01.06.2007, where, it is not […]
TATA Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) The issue under consideration is whether Tribunal was correct in rejecting the C-Forms submitted by the petitioner and hence denying statutory benefits? The Appellate Tribunal at the threshold has rejected the declaration forms on the ground of delay. It is well […]
Kambay Aromatics Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) It appears that if the petitioner could not upload the form GST TRAN1 due to technical glitches and in spite of various representations made by the petitioner, he was not allowed to upload the form GST TRAN1. In view of the settled legal position as stated […]
