Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT TDS Vs Vodafone East Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : ITAT 179 of 2019, GA 2589 of 2019, GA 2590 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/03/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5989) Calcutta High Court (209)

CIT Vs Vodafone East Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)

There is a delay of 586 days in filing the appeal for which no explanation was offered. Hon;ble High held that  even if some explanation was offered, they could have exercised our discretion. In this case, condonation of the delay would amount to condoning the utter failure or negligence on the part of the department to take steps with regard to this appeal.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

The Court: This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue involved in this appeal is over Rs.3 crores as per submission of learned counsel for the parties.

The question involved is whether payment to the distributors in prepaid SIM cards is a discount or commission and whether it would attract Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

There is a delay of 586 days in filing the appeal.

Learned counsel for the revenue acted with due diligence, in our opinion, inasmuch as on 3rd April, 2018 the judicial folder was sent by the Income Tax department to the Ministry of Law and Justice for preparing the appeal. 4th April, 2018 was the last date for preferment of the appeal.

The very next day after receiving the folder, the Ministry of Law and Justice handed over the file to learned counsel for preparation of the appeal. On 9th April, 2018 learned counsel handed over the drafts to the Ministry of Law. Had the appeal been expeditiously filed thereafter, there would have been a delay of not more than two weeks in filing it.

However, the appeal papers after moving through various departments of the government for scrutiny, approval and so on, was ultimately filed on 13th November, 2019. There is no explanation for this delay.

Although Mr. Dutta, learned advocate for the appellant contends that considering the issue involved we should condone the delay, we are of the view that even if some explanation was offered, we could have exercised our discretion. In this case, condonation of the delay would amount to condoning the utter failure or negligence on the part of the department to take steps with regard to this appeal.

Accordingly, this Section 5 application (GA 2589 of 2019) is dismissed.

Consequently, the appeal (ITAT 179 of 2019) and the stay application (GA 2590 of 2019) are also dismissed.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

October 2020
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031