Rajkumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Approver who has been granted pardon under Section 306(1) of the CrPC can be released on bail in exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. Proceedings of this matter were taken for final hearing […]
Explore Ankit Babeley vs. State of M.P. & Ors. case. Petitioner seeks permission to file Trans-1 for claiming transitional credit. High Court’s directive to respondents regarding pending representation.
State of Chhattisgarh Vs Rikki Sahu (Chhattisgarh High Court) Offence under Section 188 of the IPC can be taken cognizance of by the learned Magistrate under Section 190 of the CrPC except in accordance with Section 195(1)(a)(i) of the CrPC and unless complaint in writing is filed by the concerned public officer, on the basis […]
Video conferencing facilities can be used in all matters including remands, bail applications and in civil and criminal trials where a witness is located intrastate, interstate, or overseas.
The issue under consideration is whether the petitioner is liable for the refund for the excess amount of duty paid under customs as per the amended section 25 of Customs Act?
P.R. Mani Electronics Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) Section 140 of the CGST Act read with Rule 117 of the CGST Rules enables a registered person to carry forward the accumulated ITC under erstwhile tax legislations and claim the same under the CGST Act. In effect, it is a transitional provision as is […]
Shiv Kishor Construction Private Limited Vs UOI (Patna High Court) It is not disputed that one of the impugned orders stands passed in violation of principles of natural justice. Impugned order dated 2nd of March, 2020 is passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Circle, Bihar, Patna who issued a notice asking the […]
High Court of Orissa held that The offence of Money Laundering is nothing but an act of financial terrorism that poses a serious threat not only to the financial system of the country but also to the integrity and sovereignty of a nation.
The issue under consideration is whether the charge of interest under sections 234B and 234C on the book profit was not justified?
The issue under consideration is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that provisions of section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are not applicable for assessee?
