Case Law Details
Mohammad Arif Vs Directorate Of Enforcement, Govt. of India (Orissa High Court)
High Court of Orissa held that The offence of Money Laundering is nothing but an act of financial terrorism that poses a serious threat not only to the financial system of the country but also to the integrity and sovereignty of a nation. The International Monetary Fund estimates that laundered money generates about $590 billion to $1.5 trillion per year, which constitutes approximately two to five percent of the world’s gross domestic product. The Supreme Court of India has consistently held that economic offences are sui generis in nature as they stifle the delicate economic fabric of a society. These offences permeate to human consciousness posing numerous questions on the very integrity of the business world. The offences, such as this, are committed with a deliberate design with an eye on personal profit and often shown to be given scant regard for a sordid residuum left behind to be borne by the unfortunate “starry eyed” petty investors. The perpetrators of such deviant “schemes,” including the petitioner herein, who promise utopia to their unsuspecting investors seem to have entered in a proverbial “Faustian bargain” and are grossly unmindful of untold miseries of the faceless multitudes who are left high and dry and consigned to the flames of suffering.
The abuse of financial system, like in the instant case, has great potential to negatively impact a country’s macro economic performance and may also adversely impact its cross-border externalities. Further, such actions by the petitioner can inflict reputational damage of the country in the world of business and commerce both inside the country and abroad. The act of money laundering is done in an exotic fashion encompassing a series of actions by the proverbial renting of credibility from the innocent investors. The offenders often target the unsuspecting, rural and economically distressed populations of our state who while hoping for a dreamy return, part with their hard-earned monies.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT
1. The petitioner has approached this court seeking bail in connection with Complaint Case C.M.C. (PMLA) No.47 of 2017 arising out of ECIR/07/2009/BBSR pending before the Ld. Sessions Judge, Khorda-cumSpecial Court under PMLA, Khorda at Bhubaneswar under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
