Kerala High Court provides interim relief to taxpayer against recovery proceedings under Income Tax Act. Details of judgment and implications discussed.
Madras High Court sets aside an assessment order, allowing the taxpayer to reply to a show cause notice regarding discrepancies in GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A.
Detailed analysis of Nakoda Unique Gold Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) case where Madras HC sets aside order over GSTR 3B & 2A discrepancies.
Malaysia Metals vs Assistant Commissioner: HC grants petitioner opportunity upon payment of 10% of disputed tax demand for unreceived GST ASMT 10/DRC-01.
Madras High Court overturns tax demand of Rs. 1.4 Cr due to GSTR-1 reporting error, grants opportunity for contestation. Full judgment details here.
In PCIT vs Inderjit Singh Sodhi (HUF), Delhi High Court examines whether interest on compensation is taxable as income from other sources. Read the detailed analysis.
Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed GST returns for some period does not mean that taxpayer’s registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed, and taxpayer was compliant.
Delhi High Court overturns retrospective GST registration cancellation due to lack of details in notice and order, orders modification from date of notice.
Impugned GST order dismissed petitioner’s reply as unsatisfactory and lacking substantial documents. court highlighted absence of any request for further details from petitioner, indicating a failure to engage with submitted reply effectively.
Detailed analysis of P.Jeyaraman Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) case where Madras HC orders disposal of application for Revocation of GST registration cancellation
