RMSI Private Limited Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) Since in the present case, the impugned order has been passing without issuing a show cause notice / a draft assessment order which has been mandated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act, the impugned assessment order dated 8th September, 2021 issued under Section 143(3) read […]
Rockland Media And Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) The petitioner is challenging the non-grant of transitional credit under Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner’s counsel submits that the writ petition can be disposed of […]
Graphic aids Vs Sales Tax Officer (Calcutta High Court) As stated by the learned Advocate for the appellant that sum of Rs.16,51,924/- has been recovered after the writ petition was dismissed, we feel the interest of revenue has been sufficiently safeguarded as more than 50% of the total dues has already been recovered. Therefore, the […]
ITAT has erred in holding that the entire payments received by the Assessee from its Indian Customers on account of Centralized Services viz. sales and marketing, loyalty programs, reservation service, technological service, operational services and training programs/human resources do not constitute ‘Fee for Technical Services’ as defined under Section 9(l)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or ‘Fee for included services’ as defined under Articles 12(4) (a) of the Indo-US DTAA.
Commissioner- Shri Raju Shakthivel demanded a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/ i.e.@ 10% of the demand of Service Tax, through conduits for a favorable order in the said appeal.
Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors (Bombay high Court) The present petition has been filed in relation to the procedural difficulties/objections raised with regard to distribution and eligibility of Input Service Distributor (ISD) credit of Service Tax under Section 140 of the CGST Act 2017. It is petitioner’s case is that […]
Kerala High Court held that proceedings initiated under Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) after prelude of GST is valid on the basis of proceedings covered by the savings clause of section 174(2) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (KSGST Act).
HC held that Preventive Detention Under Section 3 of Cofeposa Act Is Not Sustainable If Legible And Translated Copies of Ruds Not Been Supplied to Detenue
Action on the part of the Respondents in not issuing notice granting reasonable time to the Petitioner to remain present and passing ex parte Order is passed in gross violation of principle of natural justice.
Petitioner seeks an order and direction against to it to rectify inadvertent mistake in mentioning incorrect place of supply in Form GSTR1
