Where authority while cancelling GST registration solely relied upon statement made by receptionist of building who could not recognise appellant’s photograph, proper course was followed, therefore, matter was to be remanded to original authority for conducting fresh enquiry
Orson Holdings Company Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. At the time of issuance of notice on 7.12.2018 in this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court has passed the following order: “1. This petition challenges the constitutional validity of rule 138(10) of the Central […]
It is pointed out to us that action of blocking under Rule 86A(3) is for period of one year. As regards one of the suppliers, account was blocked on 21 October 2021 and other suppliers it was on 14 March 2022.
It is sought to be submitted that no reason has been assigned for seizure of the goods and the reason assigned in the Form GST MOV-06 for seizure of the goods that the purchaser firm was not in existence and it was a fake sale and invoice, is absolutely false.
Siddharth Associates Vs State Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking to challenge the action of the respondent authority essentially on two counts firstly, because the order of cancellation of registration is in breach of principle of natural justice being very cryptic and non-reasoned order and secondly, the appellate […]
HC set aside order raising a demand of tax and penalty for release of the goods. Held that, neither SCN nor order of demand stated reasons for imposing tax liability as well as penalty.
The petitioner clients are strictly complying with the rules and regulations of the aforesaid COTP Act 2003 and other applicable statues and rules. They only permit use of tobacco, nicotine and herbal products in the hookahs Since there is no law banning the use of tobacco, nicotine and herbal products in bars and restaurants
Rupahali Sarees Private Limited Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) Sub-The petition in this case filed to challenge inaction on part of CIT (Appeals) in deciding the appeal against order u/s 263 which was filed on 27-1-2020 even though almost 3 years had passed. Petitioner submits that in spite of repeated remainders though almost […]
Kerala High Court held that discrepancy in quantity in the documents is sufficient for department to suspect the evasion of tax. Accordingly, initiation of proceedings u/s 130 of CGST/ SGST valid.
Jharkhand High Court held that unadjusted TDS amount under Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act is allowed to be migrated under Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
