Madras High Court held that it is not permissible for Central Tax Authorities to initiate proceedings on same subject matter on which audit already conducted by State Tax Authorities. Accordingly, notice quashed as violative of section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Calcutta High Court held that cancellation of GST registration for non-compliance of some procedural requirements is not justified. Accordingly, order cancelling GST registration set aside and petitioner directed to file return for entire period of default.
Madras High Court held that any order travelled beyond the scope of show cause notice is not maintainable. Thus, impugned assessment order under GST was passed beyond the scope of show cause notice is liable to be quashed.
Madras High Court held that completion of assessment on best judgement as the petitioner had not shown cause in response to the notice vis-à-vis assessment made after several years of return filing. Hence, matter restored back for providing opportunity of being heard to petitioner.
Gujarat High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act alleging accommodation entries not sustained in absence of any supporting, independent, tangible material. Accordingly, reopening quashed as genuineness of loan established.
PCIT Vs Colo Colour Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court in PCIT vs Colo Colour Pvt. Ltd. examined the validity of penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of alleged bogus purchases claimed by the assessee. The appeal arose from an order dated 31 July 2020 […]
Bombay High Court held that freight reimbursed by wholesalers to Parle Products Ltd. is not part of the sale price, affirming that sales tax cannot be levied on such charges.
The court quashed the appellate authority’s order that dismissed an appeal due to a pre-deposit made via this method, citing precedents from the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court.
In Bala Ji Medical Ajency vs. State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court found that a GST show cause notice that provided conflicting deadlines was invalid, leading to the reversal of the firm’s registration cancellation.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has invalidated GST assessment orders against RCC Engineering due to the absence of the assessing officer’s signature. The decision relies on judicial precedent.
