High Court while exercising powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India, does not have power to condone delay when statutory appeal filed under section 107 of GST Act is beyond maximum time limit stipulated
Ramanujan Venkatesan Vs Joint Commissioner (Appeals- II) (Madras High Court) In this case date of communication to writ petitioner qua the GST Registration cancellation order is 08.03.2022. Three months therefrom elapsed on 08.06.2022 i.e., the prescribed period qua Section 107 of CG&ST Act elapsed on 08.06.2022. Condonable period of one month thereafter elapsed on 08.07.2022. […]
Ashoo Road Lines Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh HC) HC held that Since a show cause notice dated 04.12.2020 has been issued to the petitioner and others in which the validity of the panchnama is under consideration, hence the petitioner is having efficacious remedy to contest the show cause notice before the adjudicating authority. […]
HC quashed ex-parte assessment order rejecting ITC claim & imposing tax as it was passed in violation of principles of natural justice
National Centre for the Performing Arts Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) It is not in dispute that the Petitioner has, prior to the issuance of the show cause notice, paid an amount of Rs.1,49,35,618/- electronically out of which a sum of Rs.1,09,06,948/- was deposited under the Accounting Code 00441480 as tax receipts and […]
Jharkhand High Court upholds Anosh Ekka’s conviction for acquiring disproportionate assets. Co-accused sentenced for abetting and conspiracy under P.C. Act.
Jharkhand High Court upholds conviction and sentencing of Anosh Ekka in a case involving disproportionate assets and money laundering under PMLA.
CIRP and avoidance applications, are, by their very nature, a separate set of proceedings wherein, the former, being objective in nature, is time bound whereas the latter requires a proper discovery of suspect transactions that are to be avoided by the Adjudicating Authority. The scheme of the IBC reinforces this difference. Accordingly, adjudication of an avoidance application is independent of the resolution of the corporate debtor and can survive CIRP.
The fact that shares were traded on stock exchange after paying securities transaction tax, and that money had been received through banking channels only demonstrated that they were not bogus transactions.
VRV Trading Co Private Limited. Vs Union of India & Ors (Calcutta High Court) 1. These intra-Court appeals have been filed by the writ petitioners against the order dated 22nd November, 2022 in W.P.A. No.23437 of 2022/ W.P.A. No.23438 of 2022 in and by which the learned Single Bench had declined to grant any interim […]
