Telangana High Court allowed the Criminal Petition as delayed payment of tax was on account of cogent reasons i.e. financial difficulty and was not on account of any willful attempt to evade tax.
Gujarat High Court held that issuance of notice for reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond the period of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year is barred by limitation.
Delhi High Court held that denial of refund of accumulated ITC on the ground that information regarding transfer of business and other returns to establish the transfer of stocks and capital goods not submitted is unacceptable.
Delhi High Court held that the re-insurance services were not excluded from the definition of ‘input service’ as defined under Section 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 01.04.2011.
Bombay High Court held that SVLDR Scheme covers not only tax but also interest, penalty. Hence, declaration under SVLDR in respect of notice issued for interest duly allowable.
Kerala High Court sets asides the ex-parte impugned assessment order and directs the assessing authority to pass fresh orders as the reasons for non-appearance before AO in response to the notice for hearing are found to be genuine.
CIDCO were the best judge to consider compliance with technical and financial conditions. MSETCL was consulted by CIDCO, both on account of the fact that the project had been undertaken by CIDCO on behalf of MSETCL as well as the execution of the same under the supervision of MSETCL. Therefore, the order of CIDCO was upheld in holding BNC to be technically qualified.
Andhra Pradesh High Court allowed the writ petition in the matter of cancellation of GST registration on account of non-filing of GST return as GST Tribunal has not been constituted.
Orissa High Court held that State of Odisha was deprived of recovering 2/3rd of tax due by virtue of interim order of the Supreme Court of India, accordingly, petitioner is required to compensate the State of Odisha by making payment towards interest in the interest of justice and equity.
Gujarat High Court held that as per provisions of section 276-C prosecution can be launched only if there is willful admits to evade any tax, penalty or interest chargeable or imposable under the Income Tax Act. Prosecution in absence of willful admits is unsustainable
