Mr Chawan clarifies that the concern is not about past dues, but about any incidence of tax on what the Petitioner now proposes. But if that is so, then clause (d) is entirely unjustified. It says nothing at all about tax liabilities. It only attempts to block the Petitioner from transacting the property because of the pendency of this Writ Petition. That is surely unreasonable, because the fact that this Writ Petition is pending cannot possibly be a clog on title.
Show cause notice must clearly state allegations that concerned noticee has to meet. Any notice that does not qualify this criterion, cannot be considered as a SCN
SE Forge Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) The Gujarat High Court in M/S SE Forge Limited Vs. Union of India [Special Application No.16056 of 2022 decided on 03.02.2023] held that a SEZ Unit, is entitled to claim the refund of IGST credit lying unutilized in the Electronic Credit Ledger. FACTS M/S SE […]
Madras HC declares search at Anil Jain’s residence and office illegal. Jurisdictional issues raised. Reference to Section 120 and Notification S.O.2914(E) (69/2014).
Delhi High Court held that Notifications withdrawing the exemption from the ECOs and making the levy of GST, on the fare of non-air-conditioned stage carriage ticket booked through the electronic platform like UBER is constitutionally valid.
Madras High Court held that the re-assessment proceedings initiated by the assessing officer beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year is legally impermissible.
G S Industries Vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax (Delhi High Court) The principal question that falls for consideration by this Court is whether the benefit of Order-in-appeal dated 03.01.2022 can be denied to the petitioner and the refund amount be withheld solely on the ground that the respondent has decided to file an […]
Delhi High Court held that section 3(9) of the DVAT Act does not specifically provide a time-frame for submission of documents. Accordingly, relevant documents with respect to possession of goods by person found in custody of goods should be submitted within a reasonable time.
RK Gupta And Son HUF Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) HC held that notice dated 19.05.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shows, that a survey report was generated vis-à-vis Varun Capital Services Ltd. The said communication also alludes to the fact that assessee had entered into share transaction with Kisna […]
Namoshivai Apparels Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) One of the questions that arises for consideration of this Court is whether the respondent can continue blocking the Input Tax Credit beyond the period of one year by unblocking if after the expiry of one year and immediately blocking it thereafter. […]
