Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All High Courts

Bonafide claim of assessee for an expenditure to be revenue in nature which in itself is debatable, do not attracts provision of S. 271(1)(c)

June 30, 2013 1225 Views 0 comment Print

Issue raised by the assessee was debatable and capable of two views. The assessee had an arguable case or had taken a bonafide plea. The assessee had given his explanation and categorically and clearly stated the true and full facts in the return itself. He did not try to camouflage

No addition during reassessment of a particular expense which has been duly examined by the AO during Original Assessment proceedings

June 30, 2013 603 Views 0 comment Print

Whether notice u/s 148 can be issued for disallowance of a particular expense which has been duly examined by the AO during the Assessment proceedings by asking for specific details but not mentioned in Assessment Order.

S. 80IB Expenditure incurred by a unit cannot be reallocated to another unit merely because the profits were significantly higher

June 30, 2013 766 Views 0 comment Print

Whether the expenditure incurred by a unit can be reallocated to another unit engaged in job work and claiming deduction u/s 80IA and 80IB, as the case may be, merely because the profits were significantly higher than profits earned by the assessee from other units.

Reassessment not warranted on same existing set of facts, when a return and those facts already scrutinized

June 28, 2013 817 Views 0 comment Print

Brief facts of the case are that the respondent is a joint venture with Government of Madhya Pradesh, declared its total income nil in its return filed for the assessment year 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. The book profit was calculated under section 115JB of the Act.

HC Uphelds Service tax on temporary transfer of copyright, film distribution, sale of rights to TV

June 26, 2013 5077 Views 0 comment Print

Variant modes of business transactions between the producer and distributor, distributor and sub-distributor or area distributor or exhibitor (theater owner) are not sale of goods to fall under Entry 54 List II or Entry 92A List I.

HC to decide on true scope and ambit of Section 40(a) (ia)

June 24, 2013 3310 Views 0 comment Print

The learned Tribunal was of the view that Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act is applicable only to expenditure payable as on 31st March of every year and cannot be invoked to disallow the amount which had already been paid during the previous year, without deducting tax at sources.

Whether liability outstanding for several years amounts to cessation of liabilities on account of efflux of time?

June 16, 2013 2224 Views 0 comment Print

In order to attract the provisions of Section 41(1) of the Act, it is necessary that there should have been a cessation or remission of liability. As held by the Bombay High Court, in the case of J. K. Chemicals Ltd. (supra), cessation of liability may occur__ either by thereason of the liability becoming unenforceable in law by the creditor coupled with debtor declaring his intention not to honour his liability, or by a contract between parties or by discharge of the debt.

Mere information regarding income escapement can be considered valid for the purpose of sec. 147

June 3, 2013 1505 Views 0 comment Print

Whether failure on part of AO for examining truly and fully all the material facts by the assessee could lead to reassessment and also mere information regarding income escapement can be considered valid for the purpose of sec. 147?

Expenditure incurred on maintenance, back-up and support services to existing hardware and software is revenue in nature

June 2, 2013 2962 Views 0 comment Print

Issue pertains to expenditure of Rs.1.02 crores ( rounded off) expended by the assessee and whether the same should be treated as capital or revenue expenditure. For the assessment year 2008-09 the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had debited in the profit and loss account

Sexual advances or touching private parts of a patient by a doctor is unacceptable – HC

May 29, 2013 5479 Views 0 comment Print

A physician, being in a position of trust and power, has a duty to act in the patient’s best interest. To maintain trust, a physician must avoid making sexual advances. Sexual advances or inappropriate touching of a patient by a medical practitioner is a grave breach of trust

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031