In the India Potteries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs case, CESTAT Kolkata rules 70% max depreciation on imported second-hand machines. Full order analysis.
In a case involving Competent Constructions vs. C.C.E & S.T., CESTAT Chandigarh allows the refund of excess service tax payment against adjustment towards other period liability.
In a recent case, CESTAT Ahmedabad provides relief to Bajaj Herbals, ruling that no service tax is leviable on advertising agency services provided by foreign-based service providers for marketing. Get the full details here.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s verdict in Crown Ceramics Vs C.C.E. & S.T.- Rajkot. Excise duty not demandable for a procedural lapse in the case of alleged clandestine removal of goods.
CESTAT Chennai has quashed penalties in a tax dispute case. Details of the case and the impact of pending constitutional validity challenge discussed.
Explore the Sarita Handa Exports Pvt Ltd vs. CESTAT Chandigarh case on Customs Clearance & Tour Services. Learn about the credit dispute and the CESTAT’s decision.
Explore the case of Saraswati Knitwear Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh) regarding interest on excess duty paid for clearing yarn. Discover the CESTAT’s decision.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that service tax is not applicable to rent received for immovable property services prior to June 2007. Details of the case and the verdict explained.
CESTAT Chennai rules no demand can survive against composite works contract contracts prior to 01.06.2007 in the case of Mertho Constructions vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.
CESTAT Chennai rules transporters in mines not considered Goods Transport Agency (GTA) without consignment notes, dismissing Service Tax liability for Ramco Cements.
