CESTAT Chennai rules: Redemption fine and penalty can be imposed on re-export of prohibited goods. Detailed analysis of the Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd case.
Read the detailed analysis of the CESTAT Bangalore order reducing penalty to 5L in the case of confiscation of goods attempted to be improperly exported under section 113 FERA.
Understand the implications of amending a Bill of Entry under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. Detailed analysis of Valeo India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs case and its impact.
CESTAT Chennai quashes Rs. 25,000 penalty on Gayrams Shipping Services due to absence of mens rea. Detailed analysis of the case and legal implications.
CESTAT Mumbai rules trade discount to bulk buyer of CNG not liable for excise duty. Detailed analysis of Mahanagar Gas Ltd. vs Commissioner case.
Read the detailed analysis of Rattha Holding Company Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai). CESTAT ruling clarifies no service tax on properties rented out for accommodation and related activities.
xplore the case of Shakti Cargo Movers vs. Commissioner of Customs at CESTAT Delhi, where the court ruled that a customs broker cannot be held responsible if a client fails to inform authorities of an address change.
Understand the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Commissioner regarding shampoo sachet assessable value under Central Excise Act.
Dive into the customs duty exemption dispute between Halbit Avionics Pvt Ltd and the Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore). Detailed analysis of imports for aircraft upgradation and eligibility for duty exemption.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order on the classification of Sweet Pearl P200 containing 99% Maltitol Crystals. Analysis, conclusion, and consequential benefits discussed.
