Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Sale of Goods by Importer to Another not Legally Prohibited: CESTAT quashes Penalty

April 18, 2022 723 Views 0 comment Print

Freight Link Logistics Vs The Commissioner of Customs  (CESTAT Chennai) In the present case, it is not disputed that M/s. Vaaraahi Traders are licensed to import goods and that their IE Code is valid. The case set up by the department is that the goods imported are for the use / purchase of Shri A. […]

No Service Tax on Construction Services prior to 1st July 2010

April 18, 2022 3462 Views 1 comment Print

Jagdish Pala Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the Appellant are engaged in the construction of Residential and Commercial Complexes and received the booking amount as well as instilment amount from his buyers. Revenue proceeded against them on the ground that they have evaded payment of Service Tax on […]

Spent Acid is not an exempted good so Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 not applicable

April 17, 2022 705 Views 0 comment Print

M/s IPF Vikram Sulphonation Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST, Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) The case of the Revenue is that the Spent Acid is an exempted goods, therefore, they are liable to pay an amount of equivalent 6% of the value of such Spent Acid in terms of Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, […]

Interest on Refund of excise duty amount Deposited During Investigation allowable from the date of deposit @ of 12%

April 17, 2022 3432 Views 0 comment Print

Green Valley Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) The brief facts related to the case at hand are that the Appellant had succeeded in its appeal before this Tribunal vide FO 75527/2020 dated 22/10/2020 which had resulted in refund of Rs.78,16,265/-which was deposited by the Appellant during the investigation proceedings before […]

Service by foreign entity will not fall under definition of ‘Telecommunication Service’

April 17, 2022 612 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal held that the foreign service provider being not covered under the term ‘Telegraph Authority’, the service provided by them will not fall under the definition of ‘Telecommunication Service.

Substantial evidence needed to prove allegation of non-re-warehousing of goods

April 17, 2022 729 Views 0 comment Print

Faizan Texturising Vs C.C.E. Bharuch (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Facts-The appellant is a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture of Polyester Texturised Yarn and Polyester Twisted Yarn. Their factory was visited by the officers on 21.04.2003, who conducted various checks and verifications. As a result, shortage of 7618 kg. imported raw material viz. “Bright Polyester Spin Draw […]

Penal Provisions/Confiscation cannot be invoked for Enhancement of Value on Voluntary Statement

April 17, 2022 936 Views 0 comment Print

Neno Crystal Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import)  (CESTAT Mumbai) It would not be inappropriate to mention here that the Appellant’s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in Commissioner of Customs (Sea), Chennai-I Vs. M.R. Associates cited supra wherein it was clearly held that enhancement of value based on voluntary statement […]

Service Tax not applicable on Reimbursement of Electricity Charges

April 17, 2022 2853 Views 0 comment Print

J J Patel & Brothers Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue under consideration is that whether the Appellant are liable to pay Service tax on reimbursement of electricity charges received from the service recipient M/s Gujarat Gas Company Ltd. We find that identical issue involving under the identical contract has been decided by […]

CESTAT allows Refund of Penalty

April 17, 2022 1284 Views 0 comment Print

Rajasthan Financial Corporation Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Commissioner (Appeals) had failed to appreciate the facts of the case as it is a case of refund of penalty paid by the appellant where he has considered that it is a case of refund of duty. As facts of the case are crystal clear […]

Cenvat Credit eligible on Sales Commission to Manufacturer

April 17, 2022 843 Views 0 comment Print

Varun Beverages Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) I find that the sales commission is directly attributable to sales of the products. Any activity which amounts to sale of the products is deemed to be sales promotion activity in the normal trade parlance. The commission paid on sales of the products/services with […]

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031