Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Cenvat credit admissible on ECIS services for modernization & renovation of existing factory

May 3, 2022 1086 Views 0 comment Print

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case the appellant’s cenvat credit was denied in respect of input services viz. ECIS. The credit on ECIS was denied on the ground that this service is falling under the exclusion clause in the definition of input service under Rule 2 (l) of […]

Section 11 can be invoked only when demand proposed to be adjusted reached finality

May 1, 2022 843 Views 0 comment Print

RSWM Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Excise and Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Admittedly, the dispute with regard to rebate totalling Rs.59,16,907 was sub judice before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court on the date of adjustment vide orders-in-original dated 28.01.2013. The said order is patently illegal and in violation of the instructions of […]

Service Tax not leviable if Total Receipt was below Threshold limit

May 1, 2022 2457 Views 0 comment Print

K.B. Singh (Contractor) Vs Commissioner, Customs, Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) This appeal is filed by K.B. Singh1 assailing the order-in-appeal dated 07.01.2015 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), upholding the order-in-original dated 11.02.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jabalpur, whereby he confirmed service tax demand of Rs. 3,02,906/-against […]

Central Excise Duty not exempt on ‘Module Mounting Structures’

May 1, 2022 1539 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Raydean Industries Vs The Commissioner Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) The issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether ‘module mounting structures’, which are manufactured by the appellant and which are supplied to suppliers of solar power water pumping systems for irrigating agriculture fields, is exempted from payment of central […]

Customs Broker’s Licence cannot be cancelled merely based on DGARM report

May 1, 2022 1638 Views 0 comment Print

Perfect Cargo & Logistics Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) In this case, there are no details in the SCN or in the inquiry report or in the impugned order as to how the DGARM came to the conclusion that the exporters did not exist and how after considering the defence submissions, the Commissioner came […]

Refund cannot be rejected merely for limitation if last day to apply was Public Holiday

May 1, 2022 1068 Views 0 comment Print

Credit Suisse Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Admittedly as has been held in the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal in terms of Notification No. 12/2013-ST the last date for filing of such refund application is before 30.04.2018 or to say in specific terms on or before 29.04.2018, though the same is not […]

Incentive received for using CRS Developer is not subject to service tax

May 1, 2022 2190 Views 0 comment Print

Asveen Air Travels (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The issue that arises for consideration is whether the incentive received by the appellant for using the CRS Developer is subject to service tax or not. The Larger Bench in the case of Kafila Hospitality and Travels Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has […]

Penalty not imposable when CESTAT already decided issue in favour of Appellant

April 30, 2022 507 Views 0 comment Print

KEI Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) The officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence4 visited the factory of VKM on 29.11.2006, collected information, investigated and came to the conclusion that VKM had issued invoices without receiving any raw material and without manufacturing and supplying copper ingots. Based on this investigation, […]

SAD refund admissible even if VAT/Sales Tax rate is lower than rate of SAD or nil

April 30, 2022 1662 Views 0 comment Print

Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) Vs M/s. Omya & Company (CESTAT Delhi) SAD is applicable at the time of import by way of an equitable levy in lieu of sales tax, so as to protect the domestic industry. Further, the Customs Tariff Act itself provides for refund of SAD on re-sale of the goods. The […]

Refund amount credited to Consumer Welfare Fund, on failure to discharge burden of unjust enrichment

April 25, 2022 3048 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant has paid a certain amount of customs duty. Thereafter, the appellant has sought to create an asset in the shape of ‘receivables’ so as to not pass the effect of payment of duty to the profit and loss account. To nullify the effect of the entry ‘receivables’, it has created a parallel entry exactly opposite to the receivables in its ledger as ‘provisions’.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031