Whether a Sanyasi (Renunciate) is entitled to Own Copyright in Literary Works of his Creation under Copyright Act?
The intersection of copyright law and spiritual renunciation has long been a topic of debate, especially in cases involving saints, ascetics, or spiritual leaders. The recent judgment of the Delhi High Court in The Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust India v. www.Friendwithbooks.Co (CS(COMM) 88/2021 & I.A. 78/2023) marks a significant development in this area, addressing whether a sanyasi (renunciate) can hold copyright over literary works created by them.
The Context
This case revolved around the literary works of A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the founder of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). As a sanyasi, Swami Prabhupada had renounced worldly possessions, leading the defendant to argue that he could not hold copyright in his works, which should, therefore, belong to the public domain. The plaintiff, Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust India, claimed copyright ownership through a written assignment from Swami Prabhupada.
Key Legal Issues
The defendant’s main argument rested on the premise that a renunciate automatically relinquishes all property rights, including intellectual property rights, upon taking sanyasa. The court was tasked with determining:
1. Whether a renunciate retains copyright in works created after renunciation.
2. Whether a sanyasi’s copyright can be legally assigned or transferred.
The Court’s Ruling
The Delhi High Court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, affirming that:
- Copyright is an inherent right: Under Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the author of a literary work is the first owner of copyright unless otherwise agreed. Copyright arises from the author’s creative labour, which is independent of their personal lifestyle or religious status.
- Renunciation does not extinguish copyright: Merely adopting a monastic life or renouncing material possessions does not lead to an automatic forfeiture of copyrights. These rights, like any other form of property, can only be relinquished or transferred through recognized legal mechanisms.
- Written assignments are valid: In this case, Swami Prabhupada had executed a written assignment transferring his copyrights to the plaintiff trust, which solidified their claim. The court emphasized that without such legal transfer, the copyright would remain with the author or their legal heirs.
Implications of the Judgment
This ruling has far-reaching implications for copyright law and the rights of religious and spiritual figures:
1. Recognition of Copyright as Intellectual Property: The judgment reinforces the principle that copyright is a form of intellectual property protected by law, irrespective of the author’s personal or religious choices.
2. Clear Pathways for Rights Transfer: The court highlighted the necessity of legal formalities for transferring copyrights, even in spiritual or monastic contexts. Assignments or agreements must be documented to avoid disputes.
3. Preserving the Integrity of Creative Works: For trusts, foundations, or organizations like ISKCON, which rely on the creative works of their founders, this judgment provides clarity and protection against unauthorized exploitation of such works.
4. Addressing Misconceptions: The court dismissed the argument that sanyasis relinquish all rights, setting a precedent for future cases involving similar disputes. Copyright, like other forms of property, cannot be extinguished based on an amorphous notion of renunciation but only through legal mechanisms.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s decision in this case underscores the robustness of Indian copyright law in protecting the rights of authors, regardless of their personal or religious affiliations. It affirms that copyright is a legal entitlement that persists unless explicitly relinquished. This judgment not only safeguards the creative contributions of spiritual figures but also ensures that their works are preserved and utilized in accordance with their wishes.
For organizations like Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust, this ruling reinforces the importance of formal documentation in asserting ownership rights, providing a strong legal foundation for future endeavours.
As the law continues to evolve, this case will serve as a landmark reference point in the nuanced relationship between copyright law and spiritual renunciation.
Author Bio
