Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shweta Sharma Vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 370 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shweta Sharma Vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi)

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Delhi rendered a significant decision regarding the validity of a Section 7 application in the case of Shweta Sharma Vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. The dispute stemmed from a loan agreement between the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor, ‘Shweta Housing & Hospitality Private Limited,’ wherein defaults led to arbitration and subsequent legal proceedings.

The core issue revolved around whether the Section 7 application, filed by the Financial Creditor, was valid, considering objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding the arbitral award’s legitimacy and the application’s timeliness. The Financial Creditor extended a loan of Rs. 18,09,00,000 to the Corporate Debtor, which defaulted on repayments, leading to the initiation of arbitration proceedings. Despite objections raised by the Corporate Debtor, including the claim of a void arbitral award and timeliness concerns, the NCLAT upheld the Section 7 application.

The NCLAT’s decision was based on several factors. Firstly, it analyzed the timeliness of the application, considering the date of default and the period for repayment outlined in the loan agreement. The Adjudicating Authority concluded that the application was filed within the prescribed timeframe, even excluding the period during the COVID-19 pandemic, as per a Supreme Court order.

Secondly, the validity of the arbitral award was debated. While the Corporate Debtor argued the award’s voidness, citing unilateral arbitrator appointment, the NCLAT refrained from adjudicating on this matter, as it was pending before the Delhi High Court. The NCLAT maintained focus on the debt and default issue, emphasizing that even without considering the arbitral award, there was sufficient evidence to establish default.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031