Goods and Services Tax India: Read all latest GST news, articles, notification, circulars, case laws news on, MVAT DVAT PVAT GST GSTN IGST CGST GST Council GST Rates SGST GST Forms GST Rules.
Goods and Services Tax : As per Section 18(6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 In case of supply of capital goods or plant and machinery, on ...
Goods and Services Tax : Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) in GST is a system where the recipient of goods or services is liable to pay the tax instead of th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Finance (No 2) Act 2024 been notified on 16th August 2024. The Finance Act sections 114 to 157 Page 114 to 157 (Page 67 to 6...
Goods and Services Tax : Overview of GST tax liability, self-assessment, and the distinction between scrutiny under Section 61 and actions under Sections 7...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC ruled that under Section 75(4) of CGST Act, a hearing opportunity must be granted before passing an adverse order. Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Supreme Court's new ruling revives GST on mining royalties, overturning prior decision, with provisions for tax recovery, installm...
Goods and Services Tax : Join our webinars on GST Tribunals preparation. Learn to grow your IDT practice and prepare for GSTAT with expert guidance. Regist...
Goods and Services Tax : A Superintendent in Nadiad is sentenced to 5 years for bribery. CBI also investigates two GST officers in Hyderabad for demanding ...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the latest details on GST rates for agricultural equipment, machinery, and fertilizers, and the government's stance on pot...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the latest updates on GST exemptions for the space industry. Find details on PLI schemes, government funding, and financia...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court ruled Section 130 of GST Act can't be applied for excess stock found during search; Section 73/74 should be u...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC rules that GST authorities can survey business premises for verifying transactions when goods are intercepted without...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court inTvl. Arudra Engineering Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) ruled that C-Forms cannot be deemed non...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court judgment on Hajee S M Ahamed and Company vs Deputy State Tax Officer, remanding ₹25,000 GST demand and ₹1.36...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC reinstates GST appeal for Rahul Bansal, ruling technical glitches can't negate statutory rights to challenge orders un...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra GST Circular No. 21T of 2024 updates guidelines for recovering outstanding dues after first appeal until the Appellate...
Goods and Services Tax : Instruction No. 03/2024-GST outlines procedures for CGST audits, emphasizing uniformity and reducing litigation through adherence ...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala SGST department issues a circular clarifying the method of penalty calculation under the IGST Act, 2017 for tax demands mad...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC's latest updates include a Customs cooperation deal with New Zealand, a new Hindi magazine, and significant seizures of smugg...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC issues guidelines for a second All-India drive to detect and eliminate fake GST registrations, safeguarding government revenu...
he Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.M. SAHAI, J.- Is the State vicariously liable for negligence of its officers in discharge of their statutory duties, was answered in the negative by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on the ratio laid down by this Court in Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.M. SAHAI, J.- The question of law that arises for consideration in these appeals, directed against orders passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (referred hereinafter as National Commission), New Delhi is if the statutory authorities such as Lucknow Development Authority
In Gannon Dunkerley and Co. and others Vs. State of Rajasthan and others Supreme Court held that in a building contract which is one, entire and indivisible there is no sale of goods, and it is not within the competence of the Provisional Legislature under Entry 48 to impose a tax on the supply of materials used in the contract treating it as sale
