Delhi HC ruled in Sahara India Life Insurance Co. case that Section 271(1)(c) penalty is invalid if notice fails to specify whether it pertains to income concealment or inaccurate particulars.
Calcutta High Court orders ADM and AEO to reconsider Pinki Construction’s GST reimbursement for post-July 2017 works contracts based on notification.
Calcutta High Court directs WBSRDA to re-examine GST reimbursement for Pinki Construction’s post-July 2017 works contracts, clarifying notification applicability.
Sikkim High Court sets aside tax authority’s order, allowing SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. to claim refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit upon business discontinuation.
Calcutta High Court remands Sudarshan Sarker’s GST appeal, citing an unreasoned ex-parte order and non-compliance with Section 107(12) of the Act.
A recent tweet by CA Himank Singla to CBIC India and Infosys_GSTN has opened a Pandora’s Box of frustrations and serious allegations regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration process in India.
SC upheld Gujarat HC’s decision to quash reassessment notice issued by Income Tax Department, citing lack of new material & change of opinion
The Gujarat High Court invalidated a tax reopening notice against Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah, ruling it was based on a “change of opinion” rather than new material, after the original assessment was already scrutinized.
Karnataka High Court rules Ace Designers’ write-off of foreign subsidiary investment is a business loss, not capital loss, citing commercial expediency.
ITAT Delhi overturns Rs. 74 lakh penalty on Singh Consultancy. Notice ambiguity in Section 271(1)(c) proceedings deemed fatal, reinforcing clarity in tax charges.
