ITAT Indore deleted a ₹2 lakh addition for cash deposited during demonetisation, citing CBDT Instruction No. 3/2017 which bars verification for deposits up to ₹2.5 lakhs by individuals.
CAAR Mumbai confirms Inductors, Chip Inductors, and related products are correctly classified as Other Inductors under Customs Tariff Item 85045090. This classification is based on the General Rules for Interpretation and Section XVI Notes.
CESTAT rules Semi Conductor Laboratory (SCL) is not a business entity, exempting it from service tax on CISF security. Strategic R&D lacks commercial motive.
Dismissing the AO’s view that interest should be restricted to months of operation, Tribunal allowed full claim, reaffirming that partner interest accrues on financial year-end.
Chennai ITAT remanded an ex parte assessment back to the CIT(A) after the assessee filed an affidavit promising full cooperation and no adjournments. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Delhi ITAT set aside income addition under Section 44AD, holding that Assessing Officer acted beyond his powers in a limited scrutiny case meant only for verifying cash deposits.
The ITAT Chennai restored a trust’s appeal to the AO to verify if the asset’s cost was allowed as application of income before disallowing depreciation under Section 11(6) of the Income Tax Act.
Tribunal held that CPC cannot treat entire receipts of a registered charitable trust as taxable income under Section 143(1). Intimation was quashed as beyond permissible scope of adjustment.
The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against Mangalvani Exports Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2019-20 because the tax effect was below the CBDT’s ₹60 lakh monetary limit.
Tribunal sent back case to CIT(Exemption) after noting that assessee’s Form 10AB was filed before CBDT Circular No. 7/2024, which extended due date to 30 June 2024. The matter will be reconsidered afresh in view of updated circular.
