Madras HC Directs Taxpayer to GST Appellate Forum SEO Meta Description: Madras High Court advises taxpayer to use alternative appeal remedy under GST Act, requiring 7.5% pre-deposit for reconsideration.
Allahabad High Court grants bail to three accused in a significant GST fraud case, citing reliance on confessional statements and delayed trial commencement.
ITAT Chandigarh sets aside tax addition against Amico Textiles, ruling assessment invalid due to AO’s failure to follow mandatory Section 153C procedure for seized documents.
Delhi High Court dismisses Infiniti Retail’s writ petition challenging a large GST demand but waives mandatory pre-deposit for a significant ITC amount.
ITAT Ahmedabad limits business expense disallowance to 10% for Raj Quarry, citing lack of AO justification and assessee’s loss position.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a business can restore its GST registration, even after the deadline, by filing all pending returns and paying all dues.
Delhi High Court emphasizes sparing use of writ jurisdiction in fraudulent ITC cases, citing severe harm to GST. Directs petitioner to use appellate remedy.
CESTAT Delhi affirms rejection of refund for Diamond Mink Blankets, citing finality of assessment and Supreme Court precedent in ITC Ltd. case.
ITAT Ahmedabad sends unexplained demonetization cash deposit case back to AO, granting assessee new chance to explain source after ex-parte order.
Madras High Court quashes order rejecting GST refund due to non-response, directing authorities to reconsider refund claim under Section 54 and IGST Act Section 16(3).
