Allahabad High Court rules on CGST registration cancellation – adequate notice must be served, not just portal uploading. Detailed analysis and implications.
The tribunal concluded that the Commissioner failed to present additional evidence beyond co-accused statements, mirroring the trial court’s findings. Emphasizing the principle of double jeopardy, the tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, granting victory to Abdul Razak.
Explore the Patna High Court’s judgment on Raj Kumar Sao Kishori Lal Sao vs. State of Bihar regarding ‘Korai’ taxation. Detailed analysis of purchase tax and cattle feed status.
In re Unique Welding Products Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) Introduction: The integration of solar power systems has become a prevalent practice among businesses aiming to embrace sustainable and eco-friendly energy solutions. This article delves into a specific case, namely the ruling in the matter of Unique Welding Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. GST AAR Gujarat, […]
Bombay High Court held that if an irrelevant matter is not struck off in the notice, it indicates the AO’s uncertainty regarding the basis for imposing the penalty. Such ambiguity implies non-application of mind, rendering the notice invalid.
Karnataka High Court rules against income tax reassessment after 3 years. Case: Pramila Mahadev Tadkase Vs ITO. Details of the judgment and legal implications.
Brakes India Private Limited challenges GST assessment order. Madras High Court deems notice invalid due to inadequate personal hearing time. In-depth analysis and court’s directives.
Reassessment invalid for borrowed satisfaction, reasons to believe not adverting to the failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose truly and fairly all material facts, and also the change of opinion.
Karnataka High Court invalidates income tax assessment order citing incorrect email notices. Details of Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt Ltd Vs Assessment Unit case.
Final Assessment Order lacked jurisdiction, as it was issued without providing the petitioner with a draft Assessment Order under Section 144B(1)(xvi).
