Read about Bombay High Courts decision upholding ITAT’s order directing Vodafone India to deposit Rs.230 crores to stay income tax demands, analyzing the legal implications and challenges faced.
Learn about Karnataka HC ruling on directors’ liability for GST post-dissolution in Hitachi Nest Control Systems vs. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax case.
The Allahabad HC orders a merit hearing for a retired employee’s GST irregularity inquiry, dismissed earlier as premature. Read the detailed judgment here.
CESTAT Hyderabad sets aside gold confiscation order against Rayapudi Rajasekhar. Read the full analysis of the case and the detailed judgment.
Allahabad High Court rules that tax liability quantification cannot be done under Section 130 of the GST Act, setting aside an ex parte order.
Commissioner of Customs vs Disha Tulsiani: Allahabad High Court dismisses revenue appeals over confiscation of 3.5 kg gold bars under Customs Act, citing low monetary limits.
ITAT Chennai rules in favor of Revathi Modern Rice Mill, determining that excess stock is assessable as business income, not unexplained investment under Sec. 69B.
Karvy Innotech Limited Vs State of Maharashtra: Bombay HC Quashes MVAT Order passed after expiry of four years from the end of the year containing period to which return relates
Bombay HC upholds Rs. 71.88 lakh entertainment duty for APSARA Awards while deleting Rs. 71.88 lakh penalty. Key points and detailed analysis of the judgment.
The court held that while the information prompting the notice must be disclosed to the assessee, the detailed material or evidence need not be supplied at the initial stage. The court emphasized that Section 148A aims to provide a preliminary opportunity to the assessee, ensuring that reassessment proceedings are not initiated arbitrarily or without sufficient basis.
