Mohit Vijay Vs Union Of India (Rajasthan High Court) In the present case, petitioner filed bail application u/s 439 CrPC for the offense of wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit under Section 132(1)(b)(c)(f)(j) and (I) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. High Court States that, the grant or denial is regulated, to […]
Sunland Alloys Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue under consideration is whether the DGOV guidelines are over and above Customs Valuation Rules? In the present case, the appellant imported Aluminium Scrap under various Bill of Entries and the price declared in the Bill of Entry is as per the invoice of the foreign supplier. The […]
PCIT Vs Junjab National Bank (Delhi High Court) Merely because additions made by the Assessing Officer have been partially upheld by the CIT (A), would not confer the ground to initiate proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act of imposition of penalty, unless it is found that there is concealment of material facts, or furnishing […]
The issue under consideration is whether A.O. and CIT is correct in making an addition u/s 69 for cash found during search in bank locker?
Mahle Filter Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether A.O. is correct in treating the ‘rental income’ as ‘income from other sources’? The assessee has disclosed rental receipts from its factory building and after deducting 30% as per provisions of section 24 of the Act, income from house […]
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by the A.O. for cash deposited into saving bank account by the assessee is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is that whether the CIT(Exemptions) is correct in rejecting the application seeking grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act?
The issue under consideration is whether A.O. is correct in issuing Notice under section 147 for re-opening of assessment irrespective of the fact that the material on which he relied is already present in front of him at the time of assessment u/s 143(3)?
The form of appeal shall be verified by the person who is authorised to verify the return of income under section 140 of the act as applicable to the assessee. According to the provisions of section 140(c) of the act, the first proviso says that where company is not a resident in India, the return may be verified by a person who holds a valid power of attorney (POA) from such company to do so.
The issue under consideration is regarding applicability of provision of section 43B on the registration fees collected from the customers on sale of the vehicles?
