No penalty for mere upheld of additions by CIT (A)

PCIT Vs Junjab National Bank (Delhi High Court)

 Merely because additions made by the Assessing Officer have been partially upheld by the CIT (A), would not confer the ground to initiate proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act of imposition of penalty, unless it is found that there is concealment of material facts, or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.