High Court held that Income Tax Faceless assessment order under section 143(3) rws 144B becomes invalid if Assessment is completed without following standard operating procedure (SOP).
Decision of jurisdictional high court with jurisdiction over AO should be followed and applied by NFAC. Relief should not be refused to taxpayer merely because there was a conflicting decision of a non-jurisdictional high court.
Income Tax e-Portal has added a new feature that allows taxpayers to respond to any ITBA notice/document DIN that is not linked to a PAN/TAN or Notice under Section 133(6) where the user does not have an e-filing account with the entity to which the notice is issued.
n this case addition was made u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D by AO and confirmed by CIT (A) holding that Amendment in Finance Act, 2022 in relation to disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D is applicable retrospectively even if no exempted income was earned by assessee.
Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) HC held that substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 shall be applicable w.e.f. 01.04.2021, and as per First Proviso to Section 149, limitation as specified under unamended provision as it stood prior to 01.04.2021, shall be applicable. As per unamended provision prescribing limitation, no notice can […]
Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) In the case of Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO and other 256 cases Gujarat High Court set aside Notices under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and impugned orders under section 148A(d) on the ground of limitation. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH […]
If foundational allegation is missing in notice issued under Section 148A(b), the same cannot be incorporated by issuing a supplementary notice.
Dr. Mathew Cherian Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Facts of the Case: 1. There was a survey in Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital (in short KMCH or hospital) by the officials of the Income Tax Department, on 11.2021. In the course of the survey, various documents were found and seized that, according to the respondents, […]
Non-supply of material referred to in reasons to believe would render reassessment proceedings bad, even though material for forming opinion may be sufficient
Notice Issued on Secondary E-Mail Id Despite Having Primary E-Mail Id and Email Id Mentioned in the Last Filed ITR is Liable to be Quashed- Bombay High Court
