Existing inland vessels that undergo major conversion or modification shall comply with the requirements specified in these rules, as far as it is considered reasonable and practicable by the Designated Authority.
On the Anti-Evasion front, the Alwar CGST Commissionerate detected a modus operandi relating to short payment of GST on composite supply of Commercial Training or Coaching Services along with goods such as School Bags, Notebooks, T-Shirts, Sweat Shirts, Umbrellas etc. to their students.
Vatsal Navnitlal Parikh Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) We find that additional evidences are produced for the first time before the Tribunal. These documents were not filed before the lower authorities during assessment proceedings due to family disputes. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to remand the matter back to the file […]
Dr. Mumtaz Ali Khan Afzal Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) From the facts of the case it appears that the assessee did not properly co-operate before the Ld. AO. However, considering the explanation rendered by the Ld. AR regarding the hardship faced by the assessee and since the assessee is a senior citizen, we […]
Cades Digitech Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) We find that the amounts incurred by the head office (HO) towards the salaries etc. of the employees working in their branches can by no stretch of imagination be equated to any service rendered to them by the respective branches. We find that in […]
Suraj Forwarders & Shipping Agencies Vs Principal Commissioner of GST & CE (CESTAT Chennai) The facts narrated as above establishes that service tax has been paid twice by the appellant for the very same taxable value. Though the department agrees that the earlier payment made by challan dated 05.01.2015 on the service tax registration number […]
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) In this case here is no allegation raised by the department that the appellant is not eligible to avail credit of the duties / taxes paid on the inputs / input services. To put it more clearly, the appellant would be eligible […]
ITAT Pune rules in favor of Ankit Enterprises, citing the treatment of unsold flats as stock-in-trade. Deemed rent addition not applicable.
In re Jabil Circuit (CAAR Mumbai) As applicant has failed to submit the requisite information and express their willingness to appear for personal hearing, CAAR order that the said application of M/s. Jabil Circuit India Pvt. Ltd. shall be treated as closed on the ground of non-prosecution. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF […]
Writ applicant could be said to be entitled to claim the refund of the IGST lying in the Electronic Credit Ledger as there is no specific supplier who can claim the refund under the provisions of the CGST Act and the CGST Rules as Input Tax Credit is distributed by the input service distributor.
