Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (Supreme Court) The issue to be answered here is whether summons and trial notice should have been quashed on the basis of factual defences. The corollary therefrom is what should be the responsibility of the quashing Court and whether it must weigh the evidence presented […]
ITAT held that that the A.O. has ventured on a wrong assumption of facts though the agreement was available on hand with the A.O. in the original assessment proceedings. Considering the facts and circumstances are of the opinion that the reopening on the wrong assumption of facts by the assessing officer cannot be sustained.
Majestic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that expenses incurred even for defending the directors and their relatives in criminal litigations are admissible expenses provided that are incurred in order to protect the business interest of the assessee. The undisputed facts are that the directors of the assessee company and the other […]
Govardhan Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT/DCIT (Calcutta High Court) In this matter, petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 19th March, 2022 under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to the assessment year 2014-15 being Annexure P-5 to the writ petition, on the ground that the same […]
Armstrong Pure Water Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Petitioner should have been proactive and promptly communicated the stay granted by this Court to the Assessing Officer so that he would have had enough time to make enquiries with his Advocate and also check on the website about orders passed. In […]
Integrated Finance Company Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee company, being under liquidation, was under strenuous pressure of running behind the Hon’ble High Court and public depositors as well as bond holders for consolidation and recover the dues with lack of sufficient staff and thereby […]
Poosabban Thangaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) On perusal of the Form 5 dated 25.03.2021 issued under VSVS by the Designated Authority for both the assessment years, we find that the Form 5 has been issued for full and final payment of ₹.6,250/- as taxes in terms of VSVS order under section 5(2) dated 05.02.2021 pertains […]
Unique Engineers Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax Lko (Allahabad High Court) Admittedly, the revisionist manufactured ‘AT-PLAST’ which are being used in mixing of ready mix concrete / concrete and it has been averred by the revisionist that the said product are being used along with concrete for reducing the uses of water, delay the time of […]
It has been decided to provide relaxation up to December 31, 2022, from the requirements of Regulation 58 (1)(b) of the Listing Regulations which prescribes that an entity with listed non-convertible securities shall send a hard copy of statement containing the salient features of all the documents, as specified in Section 136 of Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder to those holders of non-convertible securities who have not registered their email address(es) either with the listed entity or with any depository.
The Export Policy of Onion Seeds has been put under ‘Restricted’ category, with immediate effect. Notification No. 05/2015-20 Dated: 13th May, 2022
