Purnadisha Trading Private Limited Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) Petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the impugned order dated March 30, 2022 under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Annexure P1/p.21) on the grounds that the impugned order dated March 30, 2022 has been passed by the assessing officer concerned […]
In re Fire Prevent Systems (GST AAR Karnataka) Applicant is providing training to the trainees on fire prevention, the same is covered under SAC 999293 and is liable to GST at 18% as per Serial No.30 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR […]
Laxmi & Anr Vs Shyam Pratap & Anr. (Delhi High Court) The petitioners have claimed maintenance under the Act 1956. Section 19 of the Act provides for maintenance to a widowed daughter-in-law. The daughter-in-law can claim maintenance from her father-in-law provided he has inherited some estate of her husband. The appellant has failed to disclose […]
PCIT Vs . Universal Music India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Issues (a) Whether on the facts, in the circumstances of the case and as per law, the Hon’ble ITAT has erred in holding that in the revision proceedings the CIT cannot travel beyond the reasons given by him for revision in the show-cause notice […]
ITAT held that passing the assessment order against non existing entity is not sustainable in the eyes of law and the same is void ab initio.
After considering detailed reasoning by AO as to how assessee has introduced unaccounted money in the garb of LTCG, ITAT upheld addition.
M.D. Noorudin Zariwala Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Disallowance of amount paid to Mosque and debited as donation- It is evident from the letter of mosque produced by the assessee that the free lunch used to be provided by the mosque labourers/artisan etc. in that area. The facility of the assessee happened to be in vicinity […]
Azaz Khan Vs N.I.A. through Special P.P. (Rajasthan High Court) it is not in dispute that except Amzad Ali, all the other accused were apprehended at Jaipur Airport on 3.7.2020 while attempting to smuggle gold into India from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and an FIR was registered against them under Section 135 of the Customs Act. […]
There is no reason why a person who has been declared bankrupt by a foreign court in terms of the law applicable to that jurisdiction, should be afforded protection by the Indian Courts on technical objections being raised with regard to the validity of the foreign judgment. In the modern times of globalization, foreign creditors cannot be treated differently from domestic creditors.
Request to announce Tax Amnesty Scheme / one time settlement scheme for pending demand, disputes, appeals, litigations and recovery under various state laws and CST Act.
