In re Ms. Omnisoft Technologies Private Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) Gujarat Appellate Authority confirms the Advance Ruling given by Gujarat advance ruling authority and rejects the appeal filed by M/S Omnisoft Technology Pvt ltd. The activity provided by UCMAS using abacus does not qualify for exemption from the payment of goods and services tax. Also […]
M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Vs Director General Anti-Profiteering Central Board of Indirect Tax (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) We have carefully considered the DGAP’s Report and the documents placed on record to examine whether there was any reduction in the rate of tax during the implementation of the GST and whether the benefit of reduction in […]
Office Order No. 03 of 2019 The following transfer/postings of the officers in the grade of Joint Commissioner/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. are hereby ordered with immediate effect and until further orders:
Smt Joyti Sunil Maniyar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the notice issued u/s 142(1) dated 11.10.2011 a specific query was raised by the AO about the capital gain income. After that, the assessee vide reply dated 22.11.2011 conceded the fact of non-disclosing the capital gain income. From the above, it is transpired that the assessee […]
The product Evacuated Tube Collector (ETC) though falls under Chapter 84 heading 19 but is not covered under SL.No.234 of Schedule-I of the Notification 01/2017-Integrated Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, effective from 01.07.2017, & hence not entitled for concessional rate of 5% IGST.
Where AO had made addition of proportionate interest paid on borrowed funds on the allegation that assessee dealing in share-trading had converted its opening stock of shares to investments, the matter was remanded back to AO to determine the actual date of conversion of shares before computing any disallowance.
We find that ‘LED Lights or Fixtures including LED Lamps’ are covered under the Sub-Heading 9405 40 90 of the GST Tariff, 2017 which are taxable @ 12% (6% each of CGST and SGST).
An applicant can seek an advance ruling in relation to supply of goods or services or both undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. Further, as per Section 103 (1) of the APGST Act such an Advance Ruling is binding only on the applicant and on the Officer Concerned or the jurisdictional Officer in respect of the applicant.
In re Shradha Polymats (GST AAR Maharastra) Whether 4601 as the HSN Classification of Polypropylene Mats is correct? Heading appropriate for Polypropylene Mats made from plaiting materials is 4601 and the relevant sub-heading is 4601 99. However as it is not necessary to go beyond four digit level for the purpose of this Advance Ruling, […]
1. There would be a single cash ledger for each tax head. The modalities for implementation would be finalised in consultation with GSTN and the Accounting authorities. 2. A scheme of single authority for disbursement of the refund amount sanctioned by either the Centre or the State tax authorities would be implemented on pilot basis. The modalities for the same shall be finalized shortly.
