The genuineness and the creditworthiness of the lenders cannot be disbelieved as the lenders filed returns and also filed confirmations. Therefore, I am of the view that the assessee has proved the genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of the lenders and, therefore, the Assessing Officer is directed to delete the addition made towards bogus un-secured loans.
SNS Constructions P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case there was a difference of Rs. 14,25,463/- between books of account and the payment received as per Form 26AS. The Assessing Officer treated the amount of Rs. 14,25,463/- as undisclosed receipts and added the same to the income of the assessee. Thereby the Assessing […]
Merely that there were huge turnover i.e. deposits and withdrawal in the bank account of the assessee without correlating the same with the accounts and with the nature of the business of the assessee, in our view, that was not enough to form a belief of escapement of income of the assessee for the assessment year under consideration.
Bitcoin’s rise to popularity started in 2010 when the price of one token climbed from tiny fractions of a dollar to about $0.09. Its price has swiftly increased by thousands of dollars since then, often rising and falling within a few hours or days. Its high volatility results from its rapid and hard-to-predict price swings.
Discover the factors that complicate Bitcoins future. Explore the potential benefits and pitfalls of the highly volatile cryptocurrency market.
Like no other, Bitcoin has impacted a revolution with its decentralized peer-to-peer payment system that facilitates instantaneous, secure, and low-cost cross-border transactions. Bitcoin adoption has rapidly infiltrated several global financial sectors, including banking, investments, insurance, and remittances.
Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), in some recent cases, have dismissed certain Securitisation Applications (SAs) on a peculiar ground of prematurity- ‘no loss of possession of the secured asset’. In the opinion of these DRTs, where neither the symbolic nor the actual physical possession of the immovable property/secured asset was taken by the secured creditor, but only intimation notices to take physical possession of such property were issued by the court receiver appointed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the SAs challenging such intimation notices were premature.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) invites comments from public on the Regulations notified under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016).
Nestor Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs CPC (ITAT Delhi) The issue in this appeal is related to disallowance of expenditure on account of delay in deposit of employees contribution related to EPF & ESI. The issue is squarely covered by the judgement of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of PCIT vs Pro Interactive […]
Mysore Race Club Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Income Tax Act prescribes deduction of tax at source u/s 192 to 195 of the Act. The assessee would be liable to deduct tax at source only in respect of payments which are covered by above said sections. The case of the assessee is that it […]
