These instructions are guidelines for filling the particulars in Income-tax Return Form-5 for the Assessment Year 2022-23 relating to the Financial Year 2021-22.
Sudhir Kumar Tiwari Vs ITO (ITAT Allahabad) It is apparent that the Assessing Officer initially initiated the scrutiny proceedings to examine the cash deposit of Rs. 18,00,000/- during the demonetization period. However, on verification of the bank account as well as the reply of the assessee as well as bank, the Assessing Officer found that […]
HC held that National Highway Authority is the best judge to decide which land would be suitable for the construction of the Highways.
For considering value for refund under Section 173L of Central Excise Act, what is required to be considered is value of returned goods
NCLT held that it is the Liquidator who has to take call on what mode of sale is in the best in the interest of maximization of value of assets.
Adjudicating Authority under Rule 43 of NCLT Rules, 2016, can call for any information or evidence as it may consider necessary in its discretion
Sudipta Basu Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court is of the view that Section 119(2)(b) of the Act read with CBDT Circular No. 9/2015 provides a remedy to the Assessees to seek condonation of delay, in cases where Assessee could not file their income tax returns within time due to genuine hardship. Consequently, […]
Elora Tobacco Company Limited Vs Union of India of Indirect Taxes (Madhya Pradesh High Court) The present review petition is nothing but a misuse of the process of law and wasting valuable time of the court with the intention to take one more chance instead of approaching the Supreme Court of India. Hence, the review […]
F.No.550/05/2011-LC(Pt) Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs Room No. 49, North Block, New Delhi Circular No. 17/2022-Customs | Dated 09th September, 2022 To, All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs (Preventive) All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of CGST & […]
Mehta Metal Industries Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The issue involved in this appeal is whether the appellant assessee who is operating under ‘Compounded Levy Scheme’ is entitled pro-rata abatement/refund of duty for the period during which the machine admittedly was inoperative. CESTAT held that there is no dispute with regard […]
