This Session Covers Practical Aspects of Annual Returns and Annual Reconciliation under GST from Basic to Advanced level covering all the Relevant Rules. Session Coverage 1.) We will cover a Complete Analysis of all the tables of form GSTR -9 with Relevant Examples and Case Studies Including Technical Aspects of the form. In this session, […]
Dilip Kumar Choudhary Vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs (Delhi High Court) 1. That the Petitioner is a Proprietor of a firm named Kumar Dilip & Associates (Herein after referred to as “Petitioner Firm”) registered under with ICSI (Institute of company secretaries of India). The Petitioner firm is comprises of company secretaries, others professionals engaged in […]
It is seen from the record that the assessee had filed various evidences in the form of affidavit etc. The learned CIT(A) has brushed aside those evidences without even verifying the veracity of such affidavit. Merely stating that the affidavit was procured subsequent to marriage, in my considered view is not justified.
Deepak Budhani Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Ld. AR submitted that the assessee did not claim the amount of VRS as exempt in the return of income for the simple reason that the assessee was an illiterate person who did not have any knowledge of the provisions of the Income Tax Act and also did not […]
It is settled position of law that the time limit applicable for demand of customs duty under section 28 ibid is also applicable to recovery of amount under section 28B.
SOP, FAQS & SDD compliance certificate under SEBI (PIT) Regulations, 2015 for ensuring compliance with Structured Digital Database (SDD)
The act on the part of the respondents of keeping the impugned show cause notices in call book for unduly long period, without disclosing any reason for delay is arbitrary in exercise of powers and is also in violation of provisions of Section 11A of the Customs Act. It would in our opinion vitiate the entire proceedings.
HC held that amendment of Section 14A, which is for removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used, if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood.
Himadri Kandarp Mehta L/H of Late Kandarp Yashashvibhai Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) Law is well settled that unless the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased assessee could be said to have been submitted to the jurisdiction of the assessing officer and have participated in the assessment or re-assessment proceedings, notice to the dead […]
Proper officer cannot proceed to issue DRC-01/01A on matters never intimated to taxpayer in form ASMT 10 pursuant to scrutiny of returns
