Grit has been purchased by assessee from petty persons who are illiterate and who make their living by breaking stones by hand tools and they do not possess PAN Cards has not been proved to be false or untrue.
Menthol Scented Sweet Supari merits classification under CTH 2106 90 30 and Flavoured & coated Illaichi merits classification under CTH 2106 90 99
Graziano Trasmissioni India Private Limited Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The stand on the part of the Department is that the Online Portal mode was chosen by the petitioners, which had resulted in the entire matter having been proceeded Online. The opportunity of hearing was not granted since the same was not requested […]
When the show cause notice itself clearly says that petitioner should file written statement within seven days of receipt of the notice, we fail to understand as to how 1st respondent could have arrived at such a conclusion.
Siddhi Vinayak Syntex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) With effect from the year 2011 a time limit has been prescribed for determining the amount of duty of excise where it is possible. It cannot be gainsaid that when the legislature prescribes a time limit, it is incumbent upon the authority to […]
Calcutta High Court held that appeal against acquittal of accused in a cheque bounce case can be filed only before High Court under Section 378(4) of CrPC and not before Sessions Court.
Loans obtained by assessee were utilized for its business purposes and therefore, interest so paid would constitute business expenditure and accordingly, an allowable deduction.
Dr. BR Ambedkar Jain Kalyan Swayam Sahayata Samiti Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Undisputedly, in course of assessment proceeding the assessee went unrepresented, for whatever may the reason. Therefore, the assessee did not get any opportunity to explain the source of cash deposits made in the bank account with supporting evidence. However, before learned first appellate […]
Beterman Engineering Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) Appellant has all along taken the view that transport service is not taxable service as it was not provided by the goods transport agency, but by goods transport operator and/or individual truck owners namely an individual either owning or operating. This plea has […]
Pramod Kumar Vs ACIT (Telangana High Court) HC is of the view that present is not a fit case to interdict the proceedings at the very threshold. Reasons have been assigned by the assessing officer as to why the explanation given by the petitioner could not be accepted. Certainly, such reasons given have a nexus […]
