There is no requirement to file separate refund for IGST paid on export of goods. The Shipping Bills filed by the taxpayer itself is treated as refund application and the refund amount is processed and paid to the taxpayer if the following conditions are fulfilled:
Question No. 1: How to claim refund of IGST paid in course of supply to SEZ unit under zero rated supply? Answer: Please refer to the circular no 17/2017. Question No. 2: GST for the education counseling agencies contracted by the overseas universities- will it be covered under export or not?? Commission earned in foreign […]
Vinita Ranka Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) There is no dispute that during the course of assessment proceedings the AO noted that the bank transactions including the deposit in the bank and outward transaction are more than Rs. 4 Crores. The assessee then filed revised computation of income and admitted the turnover of more than Rs. […]
Issues with regard to slowness of AIOs [all-in-ones] have been brought to my notice. Discussions have been held with the representatives of M/S TCS, who are our vendors for the network/ AIOs and Wipro software application team. Accordingly following advisory is issued to the field formation for immediate action.
It has come to the notice of this Directorate that importers who apply for authorization for import of restricted items are submitting their applications at the concerned Regional Authority of DGFT without paying the application fee at the time of submission of application.
It is advised to all builders / construction companies that in the flats under construction, they should not ask customers to pay higher tax rate on installments to be received after imposition of GST. Despite this clarity on law position, if any builder resorts to such practice, the same can be deemed to be profiteering under section 171 of GST law.
Application for refund can be saved at any stage of completion, for a maximum time period of 15 days. If the same is not submitted within 15 days, the saved draft will be purged from the GST Portal.
When assessee failed to file any reliable evidence or documents, which could establish that she was a sub-broker and cash deposited in her bank account belong to her clients, then action of treating the entire cash deposits as per section 69 as unexplained investment of the assessee was held to be fully justified.
A bench comprising Vijay Pal Rao (JM) and Vikram Singh Yadav (AM) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently declared that Interest u/s 234B of the Income Tax Act can be levied on ground of non-payment of advance tax in respect of Alternative Minimum Tax.
Merely for the reason that new residential house property has been purchased by assessee in wife name, same cannot be basis for denial of deduction claimed u/s 54F.
