Re–Appreciation / Reappraisal Of The Material Available On Record During The Original Assessment Proceedings: Reopening Of Assessment By Forming Of Opinion That Income Has Escaped Assessment By AO, Not Allowable:
I have got a comparison Statement for Performance of State Govt. Officers vis-a-vis Central Govt. officers in 3-4 criteria by GSTN. The statement giving this in %age is placed below. As can be seen from the statement, the performance of Central Govt. officers in the States except in. the State of Arunachal Pradesh is lower than the State Govt. officers in return filing %age for the tax period April (upto 26th May 2018).
To make matters worse, in this appeal, the Union of India has engaged 10 lawyers, including an Additional Solicitor General and a Senior Advocate! This is as per the appearance slip submitted to the Registry of this Court. In other words, the Union of India has created a huge financial liability by engaging so many lawyers for an appeal whose fate can be easily imagined on the basis of existing orders of dismissal in similar cases. Yet the Union of India is increasing its liability and asking the taxpayers to bear an avoidable financial burden for the misadventure.
Expression of Interest to be in the Panel under Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals or Liquidators (Recommendation) Guidelines, 2018.
In re Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Whether GST is applicable on upfront amount (called as premium / salami) payable in respect of services by way of granting of long term lease of the thirty years or more for plots catering to public health care such as hospital, nursing home, diagnostic […]
Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Financial Services), number S.O. 2641(E), dated the 5th August, 2016, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) namely:-
Notification No. 7/2018-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) Director General, Revenue Intelligence, hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification No. 1/2018-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) dated 23th February 2018 published vide S.O. 789(E) dated 23.02.2018.
Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra, amends with effect from the 1st April 2018 FORM –704- Audit report under section 61 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
When penalty proceedings are sought to be initiated by the revenue under section 271(1)(c), the specific ground, i.e., either concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars thereof has to be spelt out in clear terms. Otherwise, an assessee would not have proper opportunity to put forth his defence. Therefore, penalty order was not sustainable in the absence of specific charge mentioned by AO.
That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -2, New Delhi has erred in deciding the appellate proceedings by confirming the additions made by the learned Assessing Officer without providing a reasonable opportunity to the appellant to submit and substantiate his claim on the additions made by the Learned Assessing.
