We direct the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to complete the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) within 90 days from today. In the first 45 days, it will be open to the IRP to invite revised resolution plan only from Suraksha Realty and NBCC respectively, who were the final bidders and had submitted resolution plan on the earlier occasion and place the revised plan(s) before the Committee of Creditors (CoC), if so required, after negotiations and submit report to the adjudicating authority NCLT within such time.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence) Notification No. 59/2019-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) New Delhi, the 6th November, 2019 S.O. 4056(E).—In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th June 2015 in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), and […]
Respondent has not charged any GST from his buyers in case of both the supplies, one effected before the rate reduction and the other after that date. Since no GST was charged by the Respondent before and after the relevant date i.e. 01.01.2019, question of profiteering does not arise in this case.
Revenue has not made out any bar for the transitioning of EC, SHEC and KKC into the GST regime and the petitioner satisfies all conditions both under sub-section (1) and (8) of section 140. The embargo placed by Rule 3(7)(b) is long gone with the introduction of GST. Certainly the powers-that-be are conscious of these factors in drafting the new legislation and the specific provision in question i.e., Section 140.
Notification No. 93/2019-Income Tax, Dated: 05.11.2019 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 93/2019 New Delhi, the 5th November, 2019 (INCOME-TAX) S.O. 4003(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) the […]
Notification No. 92/2019-Income Tax, Dated: 05.11.2019 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 92/2019 New Delhi, the 5th November, 2019 (INCOME-TAX) S.O. 4002(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) the […]
CBDT notifies Special Court for trial of offences under section section 280A of Income-tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 87/2019-Income Tax dated 5th November, 2019.
Importers who have got the quota but do not import the same by the same deadline (31st October for Urad and Moong and 15th November for Toor), proceedings will be initiated against them under FTDR Act.
The issue in these writ petitions is whether multi-function devices (MFDs) are covered under the term ‘printers’. This dispute has arisen in view of the document Annexure P-12 by a clarification which was issued by way of Circular No.1 of 2019 dated 2.5.2019 as per which it was ‘clarified’ that multi-function devices which are basically printers with additional features like photocopy, scan, fax etc. are covered within the ambit of ‘printers’.
In re M/s Penguin Trading and Agencies Limited (GST AAAR Odisha) The Applicant has referred to Advance Ruling in the case of M/s Pioneer Partners, wherein the Haryana Authority for Advance Ruling held that “The services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation, as per Sr. No 257 of the annexure […]
