Indus Tropics Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue in brief is that though entire defaulted amount of central excise duty along with interest stands deposited with a delay of few weeks, the Department is of the view that as per the provisions of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002, the […]
The raw material supplier cannot be implicated for clandestine removal of the goods by the buyer of the raw material.
G.S. Promoters Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And CGST (Delhi High court) The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, seeking waiver of pre-deposit of 7.5% of duty for maintaining an appeal against the order-in-original dated 26.11.2021, passed by the Commissioner, Adjudication, Central Tax, GST, Delhi East. Court is unable to accept that […]
Abdul Kadir Vs State of Assam (Gauhati High court) The petitioner, namely, Abdul Kadir has filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with prayer for quashing the FIR registered under Sections 120(B)/379/420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC in short). HD held that petitioner is alleged with an offence of evading payment of taxes to […]
Notice under Section 148A(b) & order U/s. 148A(d) of Income Tax Act against an entity (LLP), which was no longer in existence is invalid.
Assessee filed return of income within extended due date with Form No. 67 & complies with requirement of Rule 128(9) and entitled to claim FTC
Harish Tex Mach Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In terms of Notification No. 6/2005-ST, the exemption was provided upto the aggregate value of Rs. 4 lakh in the year 2005-06, 2006-07 and Rs. 8 Lakh in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. Accordingly, the value of taxable services of the […]
Isolux Corsan Power Concession India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case AO has treated Interest income as Income from other sources as Business of Assessee was not set-up in the year under consideration and held as follows:- In the present case, the appellant has miserably failed to demonstrate that during the year […]
Section 73 and 74 of CGST Act also provide for recovery of refund where the same has been erroneously granted.
GST registration cannot be cancelled for allegedly being a bogus firm as it is not a ground enumerated under Section 29(2) of GST Act
