In re Bhori Lal Mohan Lal (AAR Rajasthan) i) whether applicant’s tender of work contract under Chief Minister Jan Awas Yojna, is subjected to 9% CGST and SGST each post 01.01.2022? RULING- The services provided by applicant to RHB after 13.07.2022 onward until rate not changed it will attract a rate of 18% GST FULL […]
In re Glensky Spirits Pvt. Ltd (AAR Rajasthan) AAR observe that the question on which advance ruling is sought is vague in nature. Applicant is going for setting up a plant and without knowing the nature of construction categorically; it’s not possible to give ruling unless and until details are not provided. Applicant has not […]
Exposure Draft on International Tax Reform- Pillar Two Model Rules would introduce a temporary exception to accounting for deferred taxes arising from implementation of said rules and targeted disclosure requirements.
CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of CSR expenses to book profit, when there is no such requirement to adjust the same while computing book profit as per section 115JB
Dabur India Limited Vs C.C.E & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Appeal No. E/10573/2015 is filed by appellant – M/s. Dabur India Limited (Unit-1) against Order-in-Original No. VAP-EXCUS-000-COM-014-14-15 dated 30.12.2014 and Appeal No. E/10574/2015 is filed by appellants-M/s. Dabur India Limited (Unit-2) against Order-in-Original No. VAP-EXCUS-000-COM-015-14-15 dated 30.12.2014. The issue in both these appeals is common. Therefore, […]
ITAT held that requirement of filing Form 67 is directory in nature which is evident from the fact that Rule 128(9) does not contemplate disallowance of FTC in case of delay in complying with such condition.
He pointed out that when trainees are employed by the appellant, the appellant spent a significant amount of time and money in training the employees therefore, the employment contract has various conditions put on the trainees. In case the trainee breaches any of those conditions, a specific amount is recoverable from the trainees. The said amount is also sought to be taxed under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Global Construction (A Proprietorship Firm) Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) The appeal has been rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods & Services Tax and Central Excise, Ranchi only on the point of limitation since it was preferred after almost 2 years and 9 months on 29.09.2021. Under Section 85 of the Finance […]
Ramesh Jethi Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Delhi High Court) 1. This petition is filed with the following prayers:- (a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the officers working under the charge and subordinate to learned Respondent to permit presence of Petitioner’s counsel while interrogating in conformity with the law propounded by the Hon’ble […]
R.K. Industries Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) The factual finding by the JCST was that the reopening of the assessment was done by the AO by simply accepting the objection of the AG (Audit) without forming independent opinion on whether such objection by the AG (Audit) was correct or not. There was no […]
