Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motors (Karnataka High Court) Conclusion: Since Toyota was an output service provider therefore, it can utilise cenvat credit for payment of service tax on output services. Held: The respondent – M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors claimed to be manufactures of Multiutility Vehicles (MUV) for passenger cars and parts thereof […]
Confiscation of eleven gold bars-MMTC marking/brand was upheld and penalty under section 112(b) was reduced to Rs. 2,50,000 as the reliability of statement of Mr. Bajpai recorded during investigation was doubtful, as he had alleged coercion and duress.
Since Respondent had pointed out that all security features relating to the banknotes were already incorporated on the paper purchased by assessee from DLRI to be used to print the banknotes under the contract that assessee with CBK thus, any technical support or IP provided by DLRI to assessee was fully compensated in the price charged by DLRI for the paper on which the banknotes were to be printed.
Bail was allowed to accused person of committing fraud, misappropriation of money to the tune of Rs.1800 crores as investigation had not been completed despite the filing of the complaint on 30.10.2021.
District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bengalore) Conclusion: Reassessment beyond four years was not valid in the absence of failure on part of assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. Held: Assessee claimed deduction of Rs.3,50,00,000/- u/s 36(1)(viia). However, assessee debited only Rs.3,00,00,000/- to the profit and loss […]
Employees who have refused the offer of regular promotion were disentitled to the financial upgradation benefits envisaged under the O.M. dated 9.8.1999. However, the above rule would not apply to employees who were not offered regular promotion but conditional promotion on officiating basis and subject to reversion.
Mac Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) No disallowance as AO did not get jurisdiction to go behind net profit shown by Profit and Loss Account except adjustments as per Explanation 3 Conclusion: Addition on account of interest incomes to be excluded in the computation of book profits was not justified by AO as per Explanation […]
What had been manufactured and supplied by assessee was ‘concrete mix’, which was not dutiable. Revenue had not brought any facts on record in support of its allegation of manufacture of RMC by assessee. Therefore, ‘concrete mix’ manufactured by assessee was not dutiable under Central Excise Act.
Since assessee had initiated the insolvency proceedings against the Corporate Debtor only as a recovery mechanism to recover dues of ‘listing fees’ however, IB Code was not meant for recovery of dues of creditors.
Coforge Limited (Formerly Known AS NIIT Technologies Ltd) Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: Commuted value of lease rent at 11 times the rent payable for 90 years @ Rs 708913/- which amounted to Rs 7798042/- was deductible as expenditure in the year of payment as assessee chose to incur the liability of a crystallised […]
